2017 Capital Fringe Review: ‘Paper’

A cluttered desk, a twenty-minute appointment, a student and a teacher, and what ensues are cerebral twists and turns, well beyond the subdued, weightiness of departmental office hours. We inhabit this narrow space and learn about the teacher and about the student. The student objects to insensitive classroom remarks and is averse to a proposed field trip to a homeless shelter. The teacher surrounds herself with piles of papers, efforts unread from three years back. They stand in opposition: the teacher who puts pen to paper – an older white woman, and her student, a young black man who reads novels on his phone.

Written by Creative Chief John Feffer, you have walked into the world of Paper. John Feffer’s rapid-fire dialogue covers ground quickly, touching on white privilege, racism, ageism, gender, class, and the generational divide. The circuitous dialogue is at times confrontational. You wonder just who has the upper hand. In the next moment, the table turns, and the whole setting changes to a different angle.

The unexpected has just happened and the humor dashes. She finds his paper about gentrification too abstract, as it is set in an abandoned barbershop; while jargon about the basic principles of fiction writing tickle a nerve. Sophia (played by Hilary Kacser) and Emmanuel (played by S. Rex Carnegie) deliver with punch. Sophia is perfect at not ‘getting’ Emmanuel’s side of things. A perky, stubborn youthfulness dominates. Emmanuel charms with a British accent. We are drawn to the relationship between them, wanting a resolution despite remarkable barriers.

Director Scott Sedar fits in a few surprises, and the actors take the challenge. Hilary Kacser, silver hair, grey jeans, and button down blouse, completely conveys the academic persona, a scholar whose only mind-altering substance is literature. S. Rex Carnegie, elaborate braids, khakis, and business professional matches with assured timing. The repartee between the two is natural and easy, even when at odds. They have a lot at stake, more than meets the setting.

Scene three tosses all the paperwork into the air. It turns out assumptions have been made. Yikes, have you been met by your own narrow expectations? I won’t give away any more ground. See Paper and you’ll see just how far the table can turn.

Running Time: 75 minutes, with no intermission

Paper plays through July 22, 2017, at Logan Fringe Arts Space: Trinidad Theatre – 1358 Florida Avenue NE – in Washington, DC. For tickets, call (866) 811-4111, or purchase them online.



Check other reviews and show previews on DCMetroTheaterArts’ 2017 Capital Fringe Page.

Check other reviews and show previews on DCMetroTheaterArts’ 2017 Capital Fringe Page.

Previous article2017 Capital Fringe Review: ‘The Laramie Project’
Next article2017 Capital Fringe Review: ‘Lost Teeth’
Jane Franklin
Jane Franklin received a MFA from The Ohio State University as a University Fellow and certification from the Laban/Bartenieff Institute for Movement Studies. Jane Franklin’s choreography has been presented at multiple venues and festivals in the mid-Atlantic region and southwestern US and internationally in the UK and in Mexico. A recipient of the Community Foundation for the National Capital Region Creative Communities Award, Jane has developed innovative and collaborative projects combining dancers with the round wall skateboarding community, with a life size kinetic sculpture, with the architecture of a specific site, with dogs & owners, and with interactive live video and sound for numerous public art projects.


  1. I agree with this review. Actors Kacser and Carnegie are well cast as adverserials. Kacser seems to be a bit more masterful in her professorial role, Carnegie’s energy and a tightly written script move this complex plot along
    quite sprightly! The switches the occur between scenes one and two were cleverly conceived and performed by the cast. Scene three was even more innovating with its behind-the-scenes repartee between the actors as they discuss their approach to their roles. I would like to have witnessed a Scene 4, where the actors enact their intentions in Scene 3. For a truly unique experience, visit this delightfully intriguing opus, where you can genuinely expect the unexpected!

  2. I enjoyed “Paper” because of its unique twists and turns as the scenes progressed. Principles Kacser and Carnegie had the right chemistry to pull-off a truly complex sequence of repeat scenes, each rendering a different
    tone. Although, Kacser seemed a bit more comfortable as the more traditional Professor, Carnegie exhibited more enough energy as the troubled student.

    We where caught-off-guard when in Scene 3, the actors “off-stage”, began discussing their roles and attitudes toward them. It seemed as though they were trying to soften the contentiousness between the characters.

    I would like to have seen 4th Scene where the student and professor were more kindler and gentler to each other.

    I would highly recommend this intriguing play!

  3. With all its twists and turns, enjoyed this play, its performers, Hilary Kacser and S. Rex Carnegie fry much.
    I would reommend “Paper”to all


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here